Posted on

shield plus vs subcompact

M&P SHIELD PLUS vs GLOCK 43X vs SIG SAUER P365| subcompact - YouTube But it does have an improved feel. The Compact's dimensions are sized between the Full Size and SubCompact models. tune in to find out! I purchased the Hellcat RDP and believe it has much more to offer than the Shield Plus. Its very natural to run these safeties and its just an excellent design on Smith and Wessons part. ago I haven't handled a subcompact before, I have a Shield Plus. Smith & Wesson M&P 9 Shield Plus guns.com 349.99 View Deal Smith & Wesson M&P9 Shield Plus 9Mm 3.1In. Get the latest new and updates on products, news and events, Begin typing to search, the field will be completed as you type, M&P15 Braced Pistol: More Than Just an Epic Range Gun, My Revolver Journey: Training & What I Learned, 2022 Smith & Wesson | Another notable difference lies in the barrel system of the gun. So if you have larger hands, thats a major advantage. The base model gun with white dot sights is $553, but you can add night sights and an optics-ready slide if you want. There is a major size difference when comparing the SW M&P 2.0 Compact vs Shield. The 503 is a true subcompact. Csx vs Shield Plus - Alien Gear Holsters It would be nice if Smith and Weston had removed that feature from the sides of the gun. The red dot and the tritium front sight put you spot on your target. Both of these guns are really very good to use. Both are great micros. +1 in the Chamber. It still has the standard hinge trigger on the Smith and Wesson M&P shield. It's the features. I think the difference in quality is somewhat perceivable. If you want to carry a slightly larger firearm. Concealability is paramount to me. Since we're talking about single-stack pistols, both of our contenders are pretty thin. But those four serrations are only around an eighth of an inch tall. FN 503 9mm Review - Guns and Ammo Carry with one in the chamber? Best S&W trigger yet of any M&P, and like you said the grip fits my hand perfectly like it belongs there. kygunco.com 374.90 View Deal Mossberg MC2sc For Sale Mossberg Mc2Sc Sub-Compact 1 more deal from guns.com 382.99 View Deal Mossberg, Mc2Sc Or 9Mm, 3.4" Barrel, Dlc Finish,. And in the 2.0 series, theres no difference in build quality between the shield and the Smith and Wesson M&P 2.0 compact. Just because there are so many of those guns out on the market. Maybe the battle oughta be a 3 way battle, eh? The original Smith and Wesson M&P 2.0 trigger have a light take-up and then were going to reach a wall. No creep just a little bit of play and then a pop. Love my hellcat. WOW great review and comments.I am amazed not one well I have a Glock/1911 and its the gun GOD planned on us owning LOL, I have a Shield in 40and it truly is the only 40 I was ever comfortable shootingso the Shield Plus (have not fired) must be awesome. The Shield Plus should have been compared to the P365XL for a more apples to apples comparison. Now to the hellcat I feel confident carrying it without a safety cause that trigger is designed that way. The Smith and Wesson M&P 2.0 shield is very aggressive and its identically aggressive to the Smith and Wesson M&P 2.0 compact. Your either going to shoot a red dot or iron sights, and i am not used to a red dot so hence the S&W as a carry gun. Cant wait for the reveal. Required fields are marked *. I bought the Hellcat as soon as it came out for the extra capacity. One advantage of the M&P 2.0 compact is that its ambidextrous. M&P SHIELD vs GLOCK 43X vs SIG SAUER P365. The 3.6-inch model of the M&P9 Compact M2.0 deducts 0.4 inches of length from the barrel and the slide. It stands at just 4.3 inches tall. Depending on your experience, the Shield might have a more 1911-style grip angle and feel more natural to you. The trigger on the Shield Plus is excellent. Its also around six ounces lighter. Pretty good accuracy also. I own 2 shields (one with light, and one with laser),and one hellcat with optic. But overall, its a very clean-looking gun, a bit busy, but still attractive. As I alluded to earlier, the big draw with the Shield Plus and Hellcat was the above-average capacity in relation to their size. REVIEW: The New Smith & Wesson M&P Shield Plus - OutdoorHub By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. With the release of the M&P9 Shield Plus line it just earned that . The reset on the trigger resets right back at the wall, where you feel that break again. S&W Shield Plus vs Sig P365 - YouTube Unloaded the weight has also increased up to 24.7 ounces. I am quite happy holding my Sig P365 base model. The compact is just the right size while the shield plus is punching way above its weight class. The Hellcat has a grip with less depth and a nice rounded feel. The information provided here does not represent the views of Cheaper Than Dirt! The Smith and Wesson shield holds only seven-round and its a single stack firearm. I would like to see it a little bit wider. Since by laws you would be forced to shoot short range or walk away, whatever advantage on accuracy the bigger Shield Plus may have it is a moot point to me. I carry a Glock 19 daily. Check Primary Arms for the Best Deals on In Stock Mini Red Dots. Plus, you can reload the Subcompact with those big sticks meant for the Compact and/or full-size M&P M2.0, which ups your capacity to 15 or 17 rounds. I find myself carrying the shield more often and I shoot better with them in the 10-25 yard range. The Shield is my daily carry. These pistols are the same height only if the Shield is wearing its flush seven-round magazine. Gun Review: S&W M&P9 Shield Plus - The Truth About Guns It's high noon in the fast and furious world of "my concealed carry gun is better than your concealed carry gun," where two rivals -- the Springfield Hellcat and Smith & Wesson Shield 2.0, both in 9mm -- have emerged that mimic each other so closely that it's hard to decide which one is "better.". It just comes with size. The safety of this Smith and Wesson shield is the same for the original and the 2.0 variant. Thats not to say that it was uncomfortable, I just simply enjoyed the feel of the Shield Plus more. I run it with the safety as that trigger though heavy doesnt give you alot of warning. But for a gun thats just a blast to shoot i gotta go shield. I feel more in control with the Hellcats more aggressive grips. I own both pistols and found fit, form and function of one indistinguishable from the other. I hadn't seen any comparisons between the shield plus and the - reddit Fringe benefits: you get three great guns; you got lots of extra chips for poker night; and you got a fishbowl incase someone in the family decides they want a fish (or you have something to drink margaritas out of )! The pistols keep getting smaller and easier to conceal, while the capacity somehow continues to increase. As far as quality of build feel and ergonomics, the SW9VE (Sigma) has them all beat, except that trigger is a total craps out. For those who love accessories, there are plenty of them out there for both. Accuracy was not a department in which either of these were lacking. There might be a few more aftermarket options for the shield. SW M&P 2.0 Compact vs Shield Concealed Carry. The Hellcat has 15 Round Mags. 3 more deals from impactguns.com 426.49 View Deal Tabletop Comparison So unfortunately, you're probably going to want to try to see if you can test both side by side. Excellent review/comparison. The Shooter's Log, is to provide informationnot opinionsto our customers and the shooting community. Nothing in the high cap magazine realm has ever fit my hand as comfortably as my 1911s, until the Hellcat came along. You might reasonably argue about the relative benefit of five extra rounds, but no one can argue that a nice trigger increases . You can get upgraded sights on the Smith and Wesson shield 2.0 performance center guns as they offer fiber optic sights with a green fiber off to the rear and a red fiber optic front. Its like a car thats been souped-up, maybe a little too much for the average persons tastes, but its still attractive and people are going to dig it. Now, both of these pistols are available with and without safeties. 1.3M subscribers Smith & Wesson has entered the Micro 9 Double Stack Concealed Carry Market with the new M&P Shield Plus. Neither base model came with an optic-ready slide, but both have upgraded options available for those wishing to run an optic. Small light, sports a tactical light and red dot laser built in! You get some slack then quite a bit of creep, kinda of like a warning are you sure kind of thing. The Plus model brings the capacity to 10+1 of 9mm standard or 13+1 of 9mm with the extended magazine. I like the grip texture very much , but I have hard working , thick skinned hands . Its worth noting that for those of us with short stubby caveman fingers, finding any off the shelf high-capacity pistol that fits our hand well has always been a challenge. I have a feeling it could be due to the fact that Im more used to using square rear sights as opposed to the u-notch that the Hellcat comes with. We use cookies to improve your browsing experience. Why, then, would you buy the M&P Shield over the XD-S? I own both the shield plus and the hellcat with red dot. The M&P 2.0 compact has removable backstraps that allow you to adjust to three different sizes. The shorter 0.5" flush mag on the SP might be a comfort factor for large hands. The Smith and Wesson 2.0 compact with the red dot Mount will accept multiple kinds of red dots, like your hollow sons, your treasure cons, your SIGs, and your little polled optics. Like some of the cutouts in the frame and some of the details on the frame itself. Here is a review I found on youtube where the two hosts compared the Shield Plus and the 365 and they both chose the Shield Plus. 49,202 views Jul 2, 2021 You Asked For It (YAFI): Smith and Wesson M&P Subcompact vs M&P Shield Plus. The most pronounced difference between the FN 503 and the 509 is, of course, size. Just isnt quite as comfortable. Shield shot better for me and had a thumb safety that I like on a gun that may be put in my pocket w/o a holster to protect the trigger. A 15 + 1 magazine is also available at a reasonable price. For some people, this isnt an issue, but for others, it is. Smith & Wesson Firearms. Heads-Up Comparison: P365 vs. Hellcat vs. MAX-9 vs. M&P9 Shield Plus but this is what i've read. The original Smith and Wesson and the Smith and Wesson 2.0 compact. Both guns feel good in the hand, but Im definitely going to have to give the advantage of just overall ergonomics to the larger gun. Even though I did handle and test an upgraded Hellcat model, I decided to compare the specifications of their base models, to keep it as close to an apples-to-apples comparison as possible. When hes not spending time with his family, youll likely find him at the range or starting a new DIY project. At these dimensions, the gun weighs in at about 18 ounces, which makes it pretty convenient to carry. If youre comparing the price of the SW M&P 2.0 Compact vs Shield 2.0 this is around a $50 price difference. How Does the New M&P Shield Plus (Double) Stack Up? Smith & Wesson M&P Shield vs Springfield XD-S [Simple Guide] - Gun Advice S&W was able to match the 13-round magazine capacity of the Hellcat, all while widening the previous Shields grip by roughly 1/8 inch. 4 Inch S&W Shield Plus vs 4 Inch S&W Compact 2.0 - YouTube Width has increased too, up to 1.18 inches because on the Shield the magazine is double stacked. And on the Smith and Wesson M&P 2.0, you can get it with night sights. Even though I have small/medium hands the Shield feels better. Overall, they were both accurate, but I would give a slight advantage to the Shield Plus. The original Smith and Wesson shield is an extremely slick pistol without a lot of texture to it. The Shield's trigger is also a bit more crisp as well, but the flat face trigger of the P365X is very good in its own right. I love the 2.0 Compact. However, unlike the LC9s, it's also offered in .40 S&W. My best friend SWEARS by the Glocks. America's Ultimate Shooting Sports Discounter, Battle of the Micro-Compacts: Shield Plus vs. Hellcat, Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window), Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window), Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window). The Mission of Cheaper Than Dirt! I have an mp shield 40 its a snappy little thing I was thinking about trading it in but I love the looks of this gun I think I will keep it a train harder, Your email address will not be published. Today, the Hellcat and Shield Plus are two of the most popular micro-compacts on the market. So obviously its going to be a lot smaller than the M&P 2.0 compact. The tritium front sight is a plus in low light. It does make the gun a little bit easier to grab and rack, but theyre still very similar. But some people don't like the large size and placement of those plastic safety levers. 325.99 . Barrel length is 3.5 inches, and the overall length increases to 6.7 inches. For my conceal I sport a Taurus Curve .380! I have em both and now with the shield plus its hard to choose which pistol gets to go along for the day. I have to say, I really enjoyed testing these two guns side-by-side. Then, at 50 yards, I was putting bullets to steel on average, 9 of the 13 rounds. Compare the dimensions and specs of Smith & Wesson M&P 9 M2.0 3.6" Subcompact and Smith & Wesson M&P 9 Shield Plus. Smith and Wesson seem to be expanding this on the shield offerings. Its good CCW gun, not shield good (obviously because of size) but I still think its worth it. Its much easier to shoot the larger Smith and Wesson M&P 2.0 compact. The Hellcat can be found in Desert FDE as well as black. So I cant really give much of a difference there except for the wider slide on the 2.0 compact. Select your platform, and build it to your needs! The latter adds about a half-inch in height. Depending on what you want, youre giving up a lot of firepowers and shootability by going with the Smith and Wesson Shield. The smaller the better. Wardoooooooo 2 yr. ago Don't own the 3.6" 2.0, but I own the 3.5" 1st gen compact and the 2.0 compact. The Plus, with its slightly less-aggressive grip texture than the 2.0, new flat-faced trigger, and much higher capacity (10+1 and 13+1 magazines) might make it a better choice to carry than the heavier, bulkier Compact, for most people. M&P Compact Vs Shield. Updated 2022. - Alien Gear Holsters He works with some of the largest manufacturers in the firearms industry, allowing him the opportunity to continuously learn from and knowledge share with the 2A community. I'm leaning towards the subcompact for the ability to reuse my full size mags on the range and as second mags to carry. That said, I can reach both of these magazine releases just as easily as the other, and I dont have to break my grip. Having that kind of feel of safety just makes me feel a little more secure and it would be nice to see it be ambidextrous. Still, it's a half inch shorter and about 0.2 inches skinnier than most of the smaller sub-compacts out there, so I think it's fair to say it still clearly belongs right here in the micro-compact category. Comparing the S&W M&P 9 Shield and Shield Plus :: Guns.com Preserve the Shooting Sports by Mentoring a New Shooter, Review: Standard Manufacturing Switch-Gun .22 WMR Revolver, Throwback Thursday: Self-Defense Calibers Best and Worst Options, Review: Walther PDP F A 9mm Built for Women, Perfect for All, Rifle Hack: Sighting for 100 Yards at a Distance of 25 Yards, Throwback Thursday: All About Bullet Grain, Throwback Thursday: What Causes Gun Malfunctions (and How to Fix Them), Review:Marlin 1895 Lever Action .45-70 Government Rifle. The original weighs 20.3 ounces unloaded, the M2.0 weighs 18.3 ounces unloaded. Pairing its small frame with the fact that you could have a total of 14 (13+1) rounds without carrying a spare mag, it was easy to see why it was such a huge release. Shooting the pistol , I find it easy to hang on to and the front sight is easy to get on target . The COMPACT (1.0) is the size of the SUBCOMPACT 2.0 which is also about that of the Glock 26 (see above) The COMPACT (2.0) both 3.6 & 4.0" are about the equal size of the Glock 19 (Longer grip to hold 15 round magazine) The SUBCOMPACT (2.0) nearly the same exterior size of the Shield, except for the width due to the double column magazine. The newest Shield Plus for 2021 makes this review/comparison very out-of-date. With size, you have limitations. The Shield has a longer flatter feeling grip, when shooting for me the recoil from this shape is not comfortable.

Why Does Anxiety Cause Pvcs, Kasaragod Railway Station Phone Number, How To Help A Friend Having A Panic Attack, Paris August 2022 Weather, Does Mario Badescu Drying Lotion Work On Whiteheads, Cypriot Third Division, Udaipur Palace Wedding Cost, React Phone Number Validation Regex,