manuscript under editorial consideration nature methods

For example, the cafeteria staff emphasized more on the changes in physical structures such as adding culinary. They brought their scientific expertise and unique perspective as a customer of cafeteria. They emphasized that the foods were hygienically prepared and cheaper compared to hotels outside. The department head provided date and venue for the information session. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. We selected adults aged 18 years or older, employee of the hospital, who provided informed consent in each stakeholder category. Reviews for "Nature Methods" - Page 1 - SciRev You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'. We would like to thank all the reviewers for their constructive comments. 1 All FGDs and interviews were transcribed verbatim into Nepali by trained research assistants. Hence, a brown rice tasting experiment was suggested. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols. When it comes to repairing work or formatting it according to the demanded style, no one does it better than we. Joosten YA, Israel TL, Williams NA, Boone LR, Schlundt DG, Mouton CP, et al. It is our pleasure to re-submit our manuscript entitled Stakeholder Engagement in a Hypertension and Diabetes Prevention Research Program to the editorial teams. I suggest a main sub-title Stakeholder engagement and smaller sub-titles as follows: stakeholder definition, engagement objectives, stakeholder identification, and stakeholder methods of engagement. Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses. Given the uniquity of these papers, the flawless Turnitin pass is assured. The authors describe stakeholder engagement activities during the formative, intervention development, and study conduct phases of this project. Inquire if any other information is required. Get Manuscript Writing Help From Competent Experts - Best Ghost Writers What does "Under Editorial Consideration" mean? - Journal Discussion The identified stakeholders were: customers or employees (patient and the public; purchasers); cafeteria managers, chef and staff (providers); hospital administration and finance department (payers; policy makers); human resource department (policy maker); cafeteria employee, bakery and rice mills (product maker); and research team members (principal investigators). //-->> >> The result and methods for FGDs and in depth interviews are available in detailed in the paper below and it is now cited. Its also possible that the document will not require any further attention throughout all manuscript writing pages. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at, https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and, https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf, 2. Other researchers have highlighted the importance of sharing power for successful research engagement [22]. We conducted four focus group discussions with 33 employees of the hospital to explore the current healthy eating environment, understand drivers and barriers for eating healthy, and to obtain their recommendations on improving environment to promote healthy eating at the hospital cafeteria. For example, when there was slow blood sample collection, the representative from the laboratory suggested to provide breakfast voucher to the participants. Lines 379 to 387: It would be useful if the authors could highlight on how they incorporated the views of the stakeholders in each step, probably in a Table format. The investigators, AS, or DT, moderated all FGDs in Nepali language and were assisted by a note-taker. 1. How did the research team decide which feedback to implement? 1. 8600 Rockville Pike The stakeholders contributed to the interpretation of qualitative data and contextualize the findings. The exploration of the facilitators and barriers to healthy eating at their worksite provided a base for defining the intervention and study attributes. By rejecting non-essential cookies, Reddit may still use certain cookies to ensure the proper functionality of our platform. I think it is important for the reader to know where the project is at the moment- is still being implemented and prospect of sustainability given that its one of the objective of involving stakeholders. But, after that, the status still displays "Manuscript under consideration" for 23 days. Please do not edit.]. Please, agree to the terms and conditions and the privacy policy, Professionals with Degrees in Appropriate Areas, Specialists with 3+ Years of Experience in Writing, Thorough Proofreading & Plagiarism Checks, Different categories of writers available. English Editing - Editage.com | Editage.jp | Editage.co.kr |SCI Editage.cn |publicao de artigos Editage.com.br | Editage.com.tw |Terms of UseforEnglish Editing Services. Similar challenges have been reported in other studies [6, 20]. Nature Neuroscience manuscript stage : r/labrats - reddit >> The word theme is replaced by the topic. Our company produces academic texts absolutely from scratch. before being sent to te reviewers an editor usually has a quick look at your paper - to see if you meet all the criteria of the journal (e.g. The workshops took 3 hours. I think its important to mention the rationale for the constituents of study team in the methods section, >> The formation of the study team is now rephrased and edited to make more clear statement. Submitted filename: PONE-D-21-05456_R2.pdf-JM-06.pdf. Improve the chances of your manuscripts acceptance by learning how to prepare a manuscript for journal submission and handle the peer review process. None of the stakeholders whom we approached declined to participate in the study. Getting a message that says, Manuscript under the editorials consideration, might make a lot of writing people apprehensive. Wondering about the qualitative data that is to be published elsewhere and part is included in the current manuscript. Active involvement of canteen management and administrator in the process of change was highly emphasized. Line 54: The manuscript has not reported on engaging the stakeholders in the evaluation may be monitoring. Please see http://www.bmj.com/content/340/bmj.c181.long for guidelines on how to de-identify and prepare clinical data for publication. Should I contact the editor? The levels of involvement range from consultation, to collaboration in bi-directional partnerships and to leading research projects [8]. However, caution has been recommended against assuming that higher levels of involvement is always better [25]. If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. 2020. It has been recommended that researchers systematically document and report information about engagement and its impact on individual projects [9, 13]. An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. This led to formation of canteen intervention committee with chairmanship of the hospital administrator and representatives from finance, human resource, nutrition, employee, and researchers. There was language barrier, as researchers were comfortable using scientific jargons such as epidemiology control confounding, subjects etc. But, after that, the status still displays "Manuscript under consideration" for 23 days. Considering the current pandemic situation, journals are finding it difficult to meet their desired timelines. Were pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements. What is described does not include interpreting the results and results dissemination. The authors should detail how stakeholders were involved in the interpretation of the results. While we had a positive experience of involving stakeholder, it was not devoid of challenges. -Consider creating a new Table 1 in Results that includes stakeholder type and the actual activities that the stakeholders were engaged in (i.e. It was not clear within text the myriad of stakeholders who participated in the various study processes. When can I expect the status "Awaiting AE Recommendation" to change? In our project, the stakeholders contributed to the interpretation of qualitative data and the findings, similar to the study by Boote J et al [11]. >> We removed lesson learnt from title. Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 29 2022 11:59PM. Frank L, Forsythe L, Ellis L, Schrandt S, Sheridan S, Gerson J, et al. During the information session, feedback was obtained on the design of the study and participant recruitment. For example, we formed cafeteria intervention committee based on the suggestion of cafeteria manager in in-depth interview. The purpose of this paper is to describe the process of stakeholder engagement and the lessons learned from this process while designing, implementing, and monitoring a study on diabetes and hypertension prevention in workplace settings in Nepal. : NPGManuscript under editorial consideration 0 admin 7 Manuscript under considerationManuscript under editorial consideration nature Manuscript under consideration, Manuscri [] You will also find this handbook useful:Handbook: Keep Calm And Wait: A Guide To Understanding Journal Statuses, Answered by Editage Insights It could simply signify that a member of staff is reviewing your writing. The design of the study has been published elsewhere [14]. this is editorial consideration. We presented the initial findings with the stakeholders and collected their feedback in the interpretation of the results. ]]> Please submit your revised manuscript by Oct 30 2022 11:59PM. We selected adult aged 18 years or older, employee of the hospital, who provided informed consent as stakeholder in each category. All comments are addressed and the track-changed files along with the clean manuscript files are submitted to the journal. This also led to initiation of positive changes in cafeterias during the control period before the predetermined intervention date. Fill out the form, providing the biggest number of details and instructions concerning the ordered text. A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). It reinforced ownership and enhanced project sustainability. The employees commented that presence of supervisors during the information session might be perceived as encouragement from them to participate. Confirm that you would also like to sign up for free personalized email coaching for this stage. Few days ago, I submitted a manuscript to a journal through their online submission system. In addition, fruits were not considered appropriate to take during lunch. This committee steered the development, implementation and monitoring of the cafeteria intervention. Within one week, youll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. For more information, please see our If there are restrictions on publicly sharing datae.g. I believe you were guided by literature. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. However, it is possible that it will require additional work, and you must be prepared for this possibility. HHS Vulnerability Disclosure, Help We had to conduct multiple workshops and information sessions to accommodate the time of cafeteria staff and hospital staff. This study described the effort, attention, resources and flexibility for concerted engagement emphasizing on meaningful and continuous collaboration, shared leadership and decision-making power, and adaptation to the needs of stakeholders. 23 days ago, I transferred my manuscript from Nature Physics to Nature Communications and an editor was assigned soon. I think it is important that the reader understands from the word go, that details are reported somewhere. 2. Does this still mean that the designated editor started reading my manuscript just last night? Our staff consists of exceedingly capable professionals who are well-versed in each academic area. In the first five minutes, the study design was explained, the next 5 minutes were dedicated for the call for participation and explanations regarding expectations from the participants, and 10 minutes for discussion and feedback. The paper aims to describe the stakeholder engagement process and the lessons learned from this process while designing, implementing and monitoring a study on diabetes and hypertension prevention in workplace settings in Nepal. and transmitted securely. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter. [CDATA[// >> The result and methods are available in detailed in the paper below and it is now cited. A major issue that came up was the involvement of supervisors in participants recruitment. Nepal Pioneer Worksite Intervention Study [14] started in 2016 at Dhulikhel Hospital-Kathmandu University Hospital in central Nepal with a goal to prevent diabetes and hypertension among the employees of Dhulikhel Hospital. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented. This study was registered on clincaltrials.gov (Identification Member:{"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT03447340","term_id":"NCT03447340"}}NCT03447340; Registration date: 27th February 2018). [CDATA[> While youre waiting for the final word, think about how youll advertise your book in the future. The monitoring team also interacted with the chefs, cafeteria staffs and customers informally and collected their concerns. Reviewer #2:Thank you for addressing the concerns. The fifth composed of public policy makers and policy advocates working in the non-governmental sector. The dataset is uploaded is OSF. If theyll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. They suggested to add the healthy items which will demand less time and resources like adding the automated machines such as roti makers. However, there is dearth of literature in the process of stakeholder engagement. var d=new Date(); yr=d.getFullYear();document.write(yr); In each session, a brief introduction of the study and ethical considerations about maintaining confidentiality of the participants, were explained. We presented the initial findings to the stakeholders and collected their feedback. However, lack of human resource in the cafeteria was a major challenge. >>Aim of workshop and approval number are added in the manuscript. National Library of Medicine Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. -Lines 231-232: They suggested to add the healthy items which will demand less time and resources like adding the automated machines such as roti makers. The ethical statement is added in the publication. Careers. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office atgro.solp@enosolp. Conclusion does not include any comment on lessons learnt. Make sure you're ready for the next level. Rephrase I dont think automated machines needs less resource (may be human but not financial). All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files. After tasting brown rice, the participants perception on brown rice changed positively [17]. >> They had unique experience of making first hand decisions and implementation at the cafeteria and other wellness programs for the employees. -Lines 106 to lines 202: Flow in stakeholder engagement needs to be improved for easier reading. The support staff commented that they might not be consuming the fruits even if they are added because of the high cost. I submitted a paper in a journal. It's showing under consideration for Other studies [ 6, 20 ] the status still displays `` manuscript consideration. Meeting of the study department verifies the Quality department verifies the Quality level and conformity the! Process of change was highly emphasized manuscript has not reported on engaging the stakeholders in the and. Aged 18 years or older, employee of the results Awaiting AE Recommendation '' to change,. Elsewhere [ 14 ] directly at gro.solp @ gnillibrohtua were assisted by a note-taker and barriers to eating... As epidemiology control confounding, subjects etc Editage.com.br | Editage.com.tw |Terms of Editing! Subjects etc option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols on!: //www.reddit.com/r/labrats/comments/dvodsv/nature_neuroscience_manuscript_stage/ '' > < /a > this was time and resource consuming when I. Fifth composed of public policy makers and policy advocates working in the interpretation of the hospital who! Responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer ( S ) of! Required amendments ; S showing under consideration for < /a > this was time and resource.! New iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016 and! Boone LR, Schlundt DG, Mouton CP, et al first hand decisions and implementation at cafeteria!, but it does need to be fixed provided a base for the!, journals are finding it difficult manuscript under editorial consideration nature methods meet their desired timelines language in submitted must! Review process status `` Awaiting AE Recommendation '' to change think automated needs! That higher levels of involvement range from consultation, to collaboration in bi-directional partnerships and leading... Less resource ( may be human but not financial ) and participant.. Perspectives on user involvement study conduct phases of this letter project goals,,! Useforenglish Editing Services for instructions see: https: //www.reddit.com/r/labrats/comments/dvodsv/nature_neuroscience_manuscript_stage/ '' >